intermediate45 minutesLección 10 de 10

Proyecto Intermedio: Sistema de Investigación Multi-Agente

Construye un sistema de investigación multi-agente listo para producción con un agente supervisor coordinando agentes de investigación especializados para generación de informes completos.

Proyecto Intermedio: Sistema de Investigación Multi-Agente

Build a multi-agent research system that coordinates specialized agents to research topics, analyze findings, and generate comprehensive reports. This project brings together advanced state, persistence, multi-agent patterns, and streaming.


Arquitectura del Sistema

User Query ↓ Supervisor Agent ──→ Planner Agent ↓ ↓ Researcher Agent ←── Research Plan ↓ Analyst Agent ──→ Synthesizes findings ↓ Writer Agent ──→ Generates final report ↓ Reviewer Agent ──→ Quality check ↓ Final Report

Paso 1: Definir Estado y Mensajes

python
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END, add_messages from langgraph.checkpoint.memory import MemorySaver from langgraph.types import interrupt, Command from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage, AIMessage, SystemMessage from typing_extensions import TypedDict, Annotated from typing import List, Any, Optional from operator import add from datetime import datetime import json # Structured agent message class AgentMessage(TypedDict): sender: str recipient: str content: str message_type: str # plan, research, analysis, draft, review, final timestamp: str class ResearchState(TypedDict): query: str # Original user query messages: Annotated[List[AgentMessage], add] # Agent conversation log research_plan: str # Structured research plan research_findings: List[str] # Raw research data analysis: str # Synthesized analysis draft_report: str # Written report review_feedback: str # Quality review final_report: str # Approved final report next_agent: str # Supervisor's decision errors: Annotated[List[str], add] # Error log status: str # Overall status

Paso 2: Inicializar LLMs

python
# Different models for different agents planner_llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o", temperature=0.3) researcher_llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o-mini", temperature=0.5) analyst_llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o", temperature=0.2) writer_llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o", temperature=0.7) reviewer_llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o-mini", temperature=0.0) supervisor_llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o-mini", temperature=0.0)

[!NOTA] Different models optimize for cost. Simple tasks (research, review) use gpt-4o-mini. Complex reasoning (planning, analysis) uses gpt-4o.


Paso 3: Definir Agentes

Agente Supervisor

python
def supervisor_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: context = "\n".join( f"{m['sender']}{m['recipient']}: {m['content'][:200]}" for m in state["messages"][-5:] ) if state["messages"] else "No activity yet." prompt = f"""Research Query: {state['query']} Current Status: {state.get('status', 'starting')} Recent Activity: {context} Available agents and their order: 1. planner — Creates a research plan 2. researcher — Executes the research 3. analyst — Analyzes research findings 4. writer — Writes the report draft 5. reviewer — Reviews the draft for quality 6. complete — Task is finished Which agent should work next? Respond with one word.""" response = supervisor_llm.invoke(prompt) next_agent = response.content.strip().lower() if next_agent not in ["planner", "researcher", "analyst", "writer", "reviewer"]: next_agent = "complete" return {"next_agent": next_agent, "messages": [{"sender": "supervisor", "recipient": next_agent, "content": f"Proceed to {next_agent}", "message_type": "instruction", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Agente Planificador

python
def planner_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: prompt = f"""Create a detailed research plan for: {state['query']} The plan should include: 1. Key topics to investigate 2. Search queries to execute 3. Data sources to consult 4. Analysis methodology Format as a structured plan with numbered sections.""" response = planner_llm.invoke(prompt) plan = response.content return {"research_plan": plan, "status": "planned", "messages": [{"sender": "planner", "recipient": "supervisor", "content": plan, "message_type": "plan", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Agente Investigador

python
def researcher_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: plan = state.get("research_plan", state["query"]) prompt = f"""Research Plan: {plan} Conduct thorough research on each topic. For each area: 1. Find key facts and statistics 2. Note different perspectives 3. Identify authoritative sources 4. Highlight recent developments Provide detailed findings for each topic.""" response = researcher_llm.invoke(prompt) return {"research_findings": state.get("research_findings", []) + [response.content], "status": "researched", "messages": [{"sender": "researcher", "recipient": "supervisor", "content": response.content[:500], "message_type": "research", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Agente Analista

python
def analyst_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: findings = "\n\n".join(state.get("research_findings", ["No findings"])) prompt = f"""Research Findings: {findings} Analyze these findings and provide: 1. Key insights and patterns 2. Contradictions or debates 3. Gaps in the research 4. Implications and conclusions 5. Recommendations for the report Be critical and thorough.""" response = analyst_llm.invoke(prompt) return {"analysis": response.content, "status": "analyzed", "messages": [{"sender": "analyst", "recipient": "supervisor", "content": response.content[:500], "message_type": "analysis", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Agente Escritor

python
def writer_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: report_prompt = f"""Write a comprehensive research report. Query: {state['query']} Analysis: {state['analysis']} Research Findings: {json.dumps(state.get('research_findings', []))} The report should include: 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 3. Methodology 4. Key Findings (with data and evidence) 5. Analysis and Discussion 6. Conclusions 7. Recommendations 8. References Write in a professional, academic style. Use markdown formatting.""" response = writer_llm.invoke(report_prompt) return {"draft_report": response.content, "status": "drafted", "messages": [{"sender": "writer", "recipient": "supervisor", "content": "Draft report completed", "message_type": "draft", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Agente Revisor

python
def reviewer_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: review_prompt = f"""Review this research report for quality: Report Draft: {state['draft_report']} Original Query: {state['query']} Check for: 1. Accuracy of claims and data 2. Completeness — does it answer the query? 3. Clarity and organization 4. Grammar and style 5. Missing sections or information 6. Bias or unsupported statements Provide specific, actionable feedback.""" response = reviewer_llm.invoke(review_prompt) return {"review_feedback": response.content, "status": "reviewed", "messages": [{"sender": "reviewer", "recipient": "supervisor", "content": response.content[:500], "message_type": "review", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Agente Finalizador

python
def finalizer_agent(state: ResearchState) -> dict: final_prompt = f"""Based on the draft report and review feedback, produce the final report. Draft: {state['draft_report']} Review Feedback: {state['review_feedback']} Incorporate the feedback and polish the report. Ensure it is comprehensive, well-structured, and directly addresses the query: {state['query']}""" response = writer_llm.invoke(final_prompt) return {"final_report": response.content, "status": "completed", "messages": [{"sender": "finalizer", "recipient": "supervisor", "content": "Final report ready", "message_type": "final", "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()}]}

Paso 4: Enrutador y Construcción del Grafo

python
def supervisor_router(state: ResearchState) -> str: if state.get("status") == "completed": return "finalize" return state["next_agent"] builder = StateGraph(ResearchState) # Add nodes builder.add_node("supervisor", supervisor_agent) builder.add_node("planner", planner_agent) builder.add_node("researcher", researcher_agent) builder.add_node("analyst", analyst_agent) builder.add_node("writer", writer_agent) builder.add_node("reviewer", reviewer_agent) builder.add_node("finalizer", finalizer_agent) # Build edges builder.add_edge(START, "supervisor") # Supervisor routes to any agent builder.add_conditional_edges( "supervisor", supervisor_router, { "planner": "planner", "researcher": "researcher", "analyst": "analyst", "writer": "writer", "reviewer": "reviewer", "finalize": "finalizer" } ) # All agents return to supervisor builder.add_edge("planner", "supervisor") builder.add_edge("researcher", "supervisor") builder.add_edge("analyst", "supervisor") builder.add_edge("writer", "supervisor") builder.add_edge("reviewer", "supervisor") builder.add_edge("finalizer", END) # Compile with persistence app = builder.compile(checkpointer=MemorySaver())

[!ÉXITO] The supervisor loop pattern: START → supervisor → agent → supervisor → agent → ... → finalizer → END. Each agent returns control to the supervisor after completing its work.


Paso 5: Ejecutar el Sistema

python
def research_topic(query: str, thread_id: str = "research-1") -> str: config = {"configurable": {"thread_id": thread_id}} # Stream the execution for event in app.stream( { "query": query, "messages": [], "research_plan": "", "research_findings": [], "analysis": "", "draft_report": "", "review_feedback": "", "final_report": "", "next_agent": "", "errors": [], "status": "starting" }, config, stream_mode="updates" ): for node, update in event.items(): if node == "__end__": continue if "status" in update: print(f"[{update['status'].upper()}] {node} completed") # Get the final result final = app.get_state(config) return final.values.get("final_report", "No report generated.") # Run the research system report = research_topic( "What are the environmental impacts of quantum computing?", "research-quantum-1" ) print(report)

Paso 6: Agregando Revisión Humana

Add an optional human review step:

python
def human_review_node(state: ResearchState) -> dict: response = interrupt({ "draft": state["draft_report"], "prompt": "Review the draft. Approve or request changes." }) if response.get("approved"): return {"status": "approved"} return {"status": "rejected", "review_feedback": response.get("feedback", "Revise")} def review_router(state: ResearchState) -> str: if state.get("status") == "approved": return "finalize" return "revise" # Add human review to graph builder.add_node("human_review", human_review_node) builder.add_edge("reviewer", "human_review") builder.add_conditional_edges("human_review", review_router, { "finalize": "finalizer", "revise": "writer" # Send back to writer with feedback })

[!CONSEJO] Adding human review at strategic points (before finalization) catches errors while keeping most of the workflow autonomous.


Diagrama del Sistema

100%

Preguntas Prácticas

Practice Question

What pattern does the multi-agent research system use?

Practice Question

How does the supervisor communicate its decision?

Practice Question

Why does the project use different LLMs for different agents?

Practice Question

What is the role of the planner agent?

Practice Question

Where does the analyst agent get its input from?

Practice Question

What terminates the supervisor loop?

Practice Question

What type of message structure enables agent communication tracking?

Practice Question

What advantage does streaming ('updates' mode) provide in this system?

Practice Question

How can you add a human review step to the research workflow?

Practice Question

What is the purpose of the errors field in the research state?


[!ÉXITO]

Conclusiones Clave

  • Multi-agent research system with supervisor loop pattern
  • Each agent specializes in one task (planning, research, analysis, writing, review)
  • Structured AgentMessage enables full communication traceability
  • Different LLM models for different agents optimizes cost vs. quality
  • Streaming provides real-time visibility into agent progress
  • Human review can be added with interrupt() for quality control
  • The supervisor decides when the work is complete, breaking the loop
  • Checkpointing enables pause/resume for long-running research tasks
Progreso100%